← Economics quizzes

From OpenStax

Deciding Whether and How to Enforce a Patent Quiz

12 questions economics Grades 9-12

The question sheet

Reveal any answer as you study
  1. According to the section, if your goal is to stop a competitor's infringing product, what must you do?

    • Sell your patent to them
    • Negotiate a license quietly
    • Ignore the infringement
    • File a lawsuit and pursue it fully
    Reveal answer

    Answer: File a lawsuit and pursue it fully

    Source evidence

    PDF page 69: For example, if your goal is to stop a competitor from offering a competing product that infringes your patent, you have little choice but to file a lawsuit and pursue it to completion. This can easily cost from $1 million to over $10 million, depending upon the complexity of the case and the intensity of the defense. If you do not have the resources to pursue such expensive litigation on your own, there are contingency fee lawyers, who may be willing to take your case in return for a share of any damages (typically 30 to 40+ percent) that are collected from the infringer. As of 2014, a wide variety of litigation finance firms exist that may be willing to iii fund your litigation in return for a share of any damage award or settlement payment you receive.

  2. Roughly how much can litigation to stop an infringing product cost?

    • $100,000 to $500,000
    • $10,000 to $50,000
    • Under $1,000
    • $1 million to over $10 million
    Reveal answer

    Answer: $1 million to over $10 million

    Source evidence

    PDF page 69: For example, if your goal is to stop a competitor from offering a competing product that infringes your patent, you have little choice but to file a lawsuit and pursue it to completion. This can easily cost from $1 million to over $10 million, depending upon the complexity of the case and the intensity of the defense. If you do not have the resources to pursue such expensive litigation on your own, there are contingency fee lawyers, who may be willing to take your case in return for a share of any damages (typically 30 to 40+ percent) that are collected from the infringer. As of 2014, a wide variety of litigation finance firms exist that may be willing to iii fund your litigation in return for a share of any damage award or settlement payment you receive.

  3. What share of damages do contingency fee lawyers typically take?

    • 30 to 40+ percent
    • 70 to 80 percent
    • 5 to 10 percent
    • 50 to 60 percent
    Reveal answer

    Answer: 30 to 40+ percent

    Source evidence

    PDF page 69: For example, if your goal is to stop a competitor from offering a competing product that infringes your patent, you have little choice but to file a lawsuit and pursue it to completion. This can easily cost from $1 million to over $10 million, depending upon the complexity of the case and the intensity of the defense. If you do not have the resources to pursue such expensive litigation on your own, there are contingency fee lawyers, who may be willing to take your case in return for a share of any damages (typically 30 to 40+ percent) that are collected from the infringer. As of 2014, a wide variety of litigation finance firms exist that may be willing to iii fund your litigation in return for a share of any damage award or settlement payment you receive.

  4. If your goal is to obtain a royalty, what may you be able to do?

    • Negotiate a license without litigation
    • Demand triple damages upfront
    • Always file a lawsuit first
    • Abandon your patent
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Negotiate a license without litigation

    Source evidence

    PDF page 69: However, if your goal is to obtain a royalty for the use of your invention, you may be able to negotiate a license agreement without the need for litigation. Even if the infringer balks at an agreement unless you initiate a lawsuit, often the lawsuit can be settled via a license agreement short of trial. About 95 percent of patent iv lawsuits settle before trial, many with the defendant(s) taking a license for which they pay a royalty.

  5. About what percent of patent lawsuits settle before trial?

    • 25 percent
    • 75 percent
    • 50 percent
    • 95 percent
    Reveal answer

    Answer: 95 percent

    Source evidence

    PDF page 69: However, if your goal is to obtain a royalty for the use of your invention, you may be able to negotiate a license agreement without the need for litigation. Even if the infringer balks at an agreement unless you initiate a lawsuit, often the lawsuit can be settled via a license agreement short of trial. About 95 percent of patent iv lawsuits settle before trial, many with the defendant(s) taking a license for which they pay a royalty.

  6. Can small entities license a patent without a lawsuit?

    • No, never
    • Only with government help
    • Only large companies can
    • Yes, with a good patent and plan
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Yes, with a good patent and plan

    Source evidence

    PDF page 70: Even small entities and individuals can successfully license a patent without filing a lawsuit if they have a good patent and a reasonable licensing plan. Most prospective licensees know that lawsuits are very expensive and would prefer to settle a dispute with a license rather than fight a lawsuit and end up taking a license later. The key is to have a plan, and implement it diligently, with good counsel supporting the effort.

  7. Why do most prospective licensees prefer to settle with a license?

    • Lawsuits are very expensive
    • They fear the government
    • Licenses last forever
    • They dislike inventors
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Lawsuits are very expensive

    Source evidence

    PDF page 70: Even small entities and individuals can successfully license a patent without filing a lawsuit if they have a good patent and a reasonable licensing plan. Most prospective licensees know that lawsuits are very expensive and would prefer to settle a dispute with a license rather than fight a lawsuit and end up taking a license later. The key is to have a plan, and implement it diligently, with good counsel supporting the effort.

  8. What is the first step in deciding whether and how to enforce a patent?

    • Selling the invention
    • Filing an appeal
    • Hiring a jury
    • Deciding what you want to achieve
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Deciding what you want to achieve

    Source evidence

    PDF page 70: Thus, the first step in deciding if and how you will enforce your patent is deciding what you want to achieve and how much effort, and money, you are willing to devote to the endeavor. The “costs” of enforcement are not limited to the out-of-pocket expenses for lawyers and litigation expenses. Any enforcement effort requires the time and attention of the patentee, whether an individual or company, which disrupts normal business activities. The time and attention required includes providing information and documents, reviewing pleadings prepared by your lawyers, analyzing information received from your opponent during the litigation, appearing for depositions and other pretrial proceedings, and appearing at trial. Just the information and document gathering can consume hundreds, even thousands, of person hours and disrupt the normal operations of virtually every part of an organization. Enforcing a patent also takes time. Lawsuits typically take two to four years to reach trial. Post-trial proceedings can take another six months to a year, and appeals take several additional years before the lawsuit is “finished.”

  9. How long do patent lawsuits typically take to reach trial?

    • Two to four years
    • Ten years
    • One month
    • Six months
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Two to four years

    Source evidence

    PDF page 70: Thus, the first step in deciding if and how you will enforce your patent is deciding what you want to achieve and how much effort, and money, you are willing to devote to the endeavor. The “costs” of enforcement are not limited to the out-of-pocket expenses for lawyers and litigation expenses. Any enforcement effort requires the time and attention of the patentee, whether an individual or company, which disrupts normal business activities. The time and attention required includes providing information and documents, reviewing pleadings prepared by your lawyers, analyzing information received from your opponent during the litigation, appearing for depositions and other pretrial proceedings, and appearing at trial. Just the information and document gathering can consume hundreds, even thousands, of person hours and disrupt the normal operations of virtually every part of an organization. Enforcing a patent also takes time. Lawsuits typically take two to four years to reach trial. Post-trial proceedings can take another six months to a year, and appeals take several additional years before the lawsuit is “finished.”

  10. Which is a type of damages a successful patentee can reap?

    • Treble damages
    • Half damages
    • No damages
    • Refundable fees
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Treble damages

    Source evidence

    PDF page 70: On the positive side, successful patentees can reap huge monetary damages for another’s patent infringement, including lost profits, treble damages (i.e., triple the amount of money damages found), and, in exceptional cases, an award of the patentee’s attorneys’ fees. Awards of tens to hundreds of millions, and occasionally even billions, of dollars can be achieved, even if they are not typical. If you sell a product or service and are asserting your patent against a competitor, you can also obtain an injunction barring your competitor from continuing its infringement. This can reap huge additional rewards, measured in increased market share and pricing power. Patents not only offer patentees the opportunity to play offense in the marketplace, but also provide a very potent defense against charges of infringement (or other claims) by others. Competitors are wary of attacking businesses with extensive patent portfolios. The recent “smartphone wars” are a timely example. After becoming embroiled in patent litigation with Apple and Oracle over its Android operating system and the phones that use it, Google spent $12.5 billion to acquire Motorola Mobility in August 2011 to gain access to its v extensive patent portfolio so that it would have patent weapons of its own. Google also acquired 1,023 more vi patents from IBM for an undisclosed amount around the same time. Perhaps this was also partly in response to Apple joining with BlackBerry maker Research In Motion (RIM), Microsoft, Ericsson, Sony, and EMC to buy 6,000 patents owned by Nortel for $4.5 billion in July 2011, largely to keep them from falling into the hands of vii competitors like Google and Samsung.

  11. What court order can bar a competitor from continuing infringement?

    • A warrant
    • A subpoena
    • A patent
    • An injunction
    Reveal answer

    Answer: An injunction

    Source evidence

    PDF page 70: On the positive side, successful patentees can reap huge monetary damages for another’s patent infringement, including lost profits, treble damages (i.e., triple the amount of money damages found), and, in exceptional cases, an award of the patentee’s attorneys’ fees. Awards of tens to hundreds of millions, and occasionally even billions, of dollars can be achieved, even if they are not typical. If you sell a product or service and are asserting your patent against a competitor, you can also obtain an injunction barring your competitor from continuing its infringement. This can reap huge additional rewards, measured in increased market share and pricing power. Patents not only offer patentees the opportunity to play offense in the marketplace, but also provide a very potent defense against charges of infringement (or other claims) by others. Competitors are wary of attacking businesses with extensive patent portfolios. The recent “smartphone wars” are a timely example. After becoming embroiled in patent litigation with Apple and Oracle over its Android operating system and the phones that use it, Google spent $12.5 billion to acquire Motorola Mobility in August 2011 to gain access to its v extensive patent portfolio so that it would have patent weapons of its own. Google also acquired 1,023 more vi patents from IBM for an undisclosed amount around the same time. Perhaps this was also partly in response to Apple joining with BlackBerry maker Research In Motion (RIM), Microsoft, Ericsson, Sony, and EMC to buy 6,000 patents owned by Nortel for $4.5 billion in July 2011, largely to keep them from falling into the hands of vii competitors like Google and Samsung.

  12. How much did Google spend to acquire Motorola Mobility?

    • $1 billion
    • $4.5 billion
    • $6 billion
    • $12.5 billion
    Reveal answer

    Answer: $12.5 billion

    Source evidence

    PDF page 70: On the positive side, successful patentees can reap huge monetary damages for another’s patent infringement, including lost profits, treble damages (i.e., triple the amount of money damages found), and, in exceptional cases, an award of the patentee’s attorneys’ fees. Awards of tens to hundreds of millions, and occasionally even billions, of dollars can be achieved, even if they are not typical. If you sell a product or service and are asserting your patent against a competitor, you can also obtain an injunction barring your competitor from continuing its infringement. This can reap huge additional rewards, measured in increased market share and pricing power. Patents not only offer patentees the opportunity to play offense in the marketplace, but also provide a very potent defense against charges of infringement (or other claims) by others. Competitors are wary of attacking businesses with extensive patent portfolios. The recent “smartphone wars” are a timely example. After becoming embroiled in patent litigation with Apple and Oracle over its Android operating system and the phones that use it, Google spent $12.5 billion to acquire Motorola Mobility in August 2011 to gain access to its v extensive patent portfolio so that it would have patent weapons of its own. Google also acquired 1,023 more vi patents from IBM for an undisclosed amount around the same time. Perhaps this was also partly in response to Apple joining with BlackBerry maker Research In Motion (RIM), Microsoft, Ericsson, Sony, and EMC to buy 6,000 patents owned by Nortel for $4.5 billion in July 2011, largely to keep them from falling into the hands of vii competitors like Google and Samsung.

Play the whole quiz inside a game Answers stay hidden while you play
Source

Introduction to Intellectual Property

Introduction to Intellectual Property by OpenStax, used under CC BY 4.0. Changes made by Stratacademy.

Make your own — free

Turn any notes into a game in under a minute. Free to start.

Make a quiz