Rights and Term Quiz
The question sheet
Reveal any answer as you study-
For an individual author, how long does a copyright last?
- Life of the author plus 70 years
- 95 years from publication
- Life of the author plus 50 years
- 120 years from creation
Reveal answer
Answer: Life of the author plus 70 years
Source evidence
PDF page 120: The term or time period of a copyright varies. For an individual, the term of a copyright is the life of the author plus 70 years after the author is deceased. For a work with two or more authors, the term expires 70 years after the last author’s death. Finally, for works that are “made for hire,” or anonymous or pseudonymous works, the copyright term lasts 95 years from the first publication or 120 years from the year of the work’s
-
For a work with two or more authors, the copyright term expires when?
- 120 years after creation
- 95 years after creation
- 70 years after last author's death
- 50 years after first publication
Reveal answer
Answer: 70 years after last author's death
Source evidence
PDF page 120: The term or time period of a copyright varies. For an individual, the term of a copyright is the life of the author plus 70 years after the author is deceased. For a work with two or more authors, the term expires 70 years after the last author’s death. Finally, for works that are “made for hire,” or anonymous or pseudonymous works, the copyright term lasts 95 years from the first publication or 120 years from the year of the work’s
-
How many exclusive rights does copyright law provide?
- Four
- Six
- Three
- Eight
Reveal answer
Answer: Six
Source evidence
PDF page 120: too, does copyright law provide for six roughly analogous exclusive rights:
-
The exclusive rights of a copyright belong to whom?
- Anyone who buys a copy
- The government
- The general public
- Copyright owners or their assignees
Reveal answer
Answer: Copyright owners or their assignees
Source evidence
PDF page 120: These rights are exclusive to copyright owners—only they or those to whom they have legally assigned their rights can act upon them. Only the author of a copyrighted book, for example, can decide to make copies of (i.e., publish) the work and prepare derivatives of the book, such as a movie version of it. If any person other than the author and copyright owner were to make a movie based on the book, that person would infringe the copyright.
-
Making a movie based on a copyrighted book without permission would:
- Infringe the copyright
- End the author's rights
- Be permitted under fair use
- Require no author consent
Reveal answer
Answer: Infringe the copyright
Source evidence
PDF page 120: These rights are exclusive to copyright owners—only they or those to whom they have legally assigned their rights can act upon them. Only the author of a copyrighted book, for example, can decide to make copies of (i.e., publish) the work and prepare derivatives of the book, such as a movie version of it. If any person other than the author and copyright owner were to make a movie based on the book, that person would infringe the copyright.
-
In the 2013 example, when would an anonymous 1951 diary's copyright expire?
- 2033
- 2071
- 2108
- 2013
Reveal answer
Answer: 2071
Source evidence
PDF page 120: On the other hand, imagine that an anonymous Korean War soldier’s diary, dated “December 1951” is discovered in an antique shop in the year 2013 and published that same year. Ordinarily, the copyright for an anonymous work would last for 95 years from the date of first publication, expiring in the year 2108. But because the date of creation is known to be 1951, the copyright would expire in 2071, or 120 years after it was written.
-
Which doctrine limits an author's distribution rights after a sale?
- First-sale doctrine
- Work for hire doctrine
- Moral rights doctrine
- Fair use doctrine
Reveal answer
Answer: First-sale doctrine
Source evidence
PDF page 121: It is important to note, however, that an author’s distribution rights (No. 3 above) are strictly limited by what is known as the first-sale doctrine, which terminates those distribution rights once he sells or distributes the work to someone else. For example, once the author of a copyrighted novel lets a publisher distribute copies of that novel to a bookstore, the author’s distribution rights to those copies are ended and the bookstore can do whatever it wants with them—sell them, rent them, give them away, or throw them in the dumpster. The bookstore owner cannot, however, make additional copies of the book because the first-sale doctrine does not limit a copyright owner’s reproduction right (the first right listed above). The first-sale doctrine was first delineated in the 1908 Supreme Court case Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus (https://www.openstax.org/l/BobbsMerrillCoVStraus) . The Bobbs-Merrill Co. distributed copies of a novel titled The Castaway to retailers with the proviso that these be sold for exactly one dollar. Printed right in the book itself, in fact, right after the title page, was the following notice:
-
The first-sale doctrine does NOT limit a copyright owner's:
- Distribution right
- Reproduction right
- Right to sell copies
- Right to lend copies
Reveal answer
Answer: Reproduction right
Source evidence
PDF page 121: It is important to note, however, that an author’s distribution rights (No. 3 above) are strictly limited by what is known as the first-sale doctrine, which terminates those distribution rights once he sells or distributes the work to someone else. For example, once the author of a copyrighted novel lets a publisher distribute copies of that novel to a bookstore, the author’s distribution rights to those copies are ended and the bookstore can do whatever it wants with them—sell them, rent them, give them away, or throw them in the dumpster. The bookstore owner cannot, however, make additional copies of the book because the first-sale doctrine does not limit a copyright owner’s reproduction right (the first right listed above). The first-sale doctrine was first delineated in the 1908 Supreme Court case Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus (https://www.openstax.org/l/BobbsMerrillCoVStraus) . The Bobbs-Merrill Co. distributed copies of a novel titled The Castaway to retailers with the proviso that these be sold for exactly one dollar. Printed right in the book itself, in fact, right after the title page, was the following notice:
-
Which case first delineated the first-sale doctrine?
- ReDigi case
- Vernor v. Autodesk
- Kirtsaeng case
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus
Reveal answer
Answer: Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus
Source evidence
PDF page 121: It is important to note, however, that an author’s distribution rights (No. 3 above) are strictly limited by what is known as the first-sale doctrine, which terminates those distribution rights once he sells or distributes the work to someone else. For example, once the author of a copyrighted novel lets a publisher distribute copies of that novel to a bookstore, the author’s distribution rights to those copies are ended and the bookstore can do whatever it wants with them—sell them, rent them, give them away, or throw them in the dumpster. The bookstore owner cannot, however, make additional copies of the book because the first-sale doctrine does not limit a copyright owner’s reproduction right (the first right listed above). The first-sale doctrine was first delineated in the 1908 Supreme Court case Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus (https://www.openstax.org/l/BobbsMerrillCoVStraus) . The Bobbs-Merrill Co. distributed copies of a novel titled The Castaway to retailers with the proviso that these be sold for exactly one dollar. Printed right in the book itself, in fact, right after the title page, was the following notice:
-
In Vernor v. Autodesk, software was ruled not subject to first-sale because buyers were:
- Infringers
- Owners
- Manufacturers
- Licensees
Reveal answer
Answer: Licensees
Source evidence
PDF page 121: The first-sale doctrine was also limited by Vernor v. Autodesk (https://www.openstax.org/l/VernorVAutodesk) , when an appeals court in 2010 ruled that software was not subject to the first-sale doctrine because purchasers of software were actually only licensees and therefore could not resell the software to others.
-
In the 2013 ReDigi ruling, resale of digital music concerned which right?
- Distribution right
- Moral rights
- Reproduction right
- Attribution right
Reveal answer
Answer: Reproduction right
Source evidence
PDF page 122: music that involved creating a new copy on someone else’s computer while erasing the copy on your computer actually concerned the reproduction right, not the distribution right, and the first-sale doctrine therefore did not apply. (You could sell your hard drive that has your music files on it, but most people would not want to do that!) But this decision is likely only the first round in what many feel will ultimately be a successful effort to create legal markets for secondhand digital goods.
-
Under U.S. law, moral rights exist for how long?
- 95 years
- Life of author plus 70 years
- Only the life of the author
- Forever
Reveal answer
Answer: Only the life of the author
Source evidence
PDF page 122: Both of these rights, however, have limitations. Under U.S. law, because moral rights are personal, they exist only for the life of the author. Only the author can enforce those rights; they cannot be transferred by the author to heirs or anyone else.
Introduction To Intellectual Property 2e
Introduction To Intellectual Property 2e by OpenStax, used under CC BY 4.0. Changes made by Stratacademy.
Make your own — free
Turn any notes into a game in under a minute. Free to start.