← Geography quizzes

From University System of Georgia

THE ELECTORAL PROCESS Quiz

12 questions geography Grades 9-12

The question sheet

Reveal any answer as you study
  1. What is the practice of rearranging voting district boundaries to ensure election victory called?

    • Precinct pooling
    • Districting bias
    • Gerrymandering
    • Redistricting
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Gerrymandering

    Source evidence

    PDF page 163: In the United States, boundaries play an important role in the electoral process, but in this case, district, and precinct boundaries are significant in contrast to the country boundaries that have been previously discussed. Political parties in power will sometimes rearrange the boundaries of voting districts in order to ensure victory in elections, and this practice is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering strategies can involve drawing the boundaries so that the majority of voters in a district favor the party in power. Another method is to segregate the opposition voters into several different districts (Figure 8.6). While gerrymandering is not generally illegal in the United States, it can be challenged in court when it appears to clearly discriminate against minority populations. For example, when legislative districts where redrawn in 2015 in Gwinnett and Henry counties in Georgia, the NAACP filed a federal lawsuit because of the perception that the adjustment violated the rights of minority black

  2. In the U.S. electoral process, which boundaries are significant according to the source?

    • Physical boundaries
    • Continental boundaries
    • Country boundaries
    • District and precinct boundaries
    Reveal answer

    Answer: District and precinct boundaries

    Source evidence

    PDF page 163: In the United States, boundaries play an important role in the electoral process, but in this case, district, and precinct boundaries are significant in contrast to the country boundaries that have been previously discussed. Political parties in power will sometimes rearrange the boundaries of voting districts in order to ensure victory in elections, and this practice is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering strategies can involve drawing the boundaries so that the majority of voters in a district favor the party in power. Another method is to segregate the opposition voters into several different districts (Figure 8.6). While gerrymandering is not generally illegal in the United States, it can be challenged in court when it appears to clearly discriminate against minority populations. For example, when legislative districts where redrawn in 2015 in Gwinnett and Henry counties in Georgia, the NAACP filed a federal lawsuit because of the perception that the adjustment violated the rights of minority black

  3. One gerrymandering method segregates opposition voters how?

    • Into a single district
    • Into several different districts
    • Into rural counties only
    • Outside the state
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Into several different districts

    Source evidence

    PDF page 163: In the United States, boundaries play an important role in the electoral process, but in this case, district, and precinct boundaries are significant in contrast to the country boundaries that have been previously discussed. Political parties in power will sometimes rearrange the boundaries of voting districts in order to ensure victory in elections, and this practice is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering strategies can involve drawing the boundaries so that the majority of voters in a district favor the party in power. Another method is to segregate the opposition voters into several different districts (Figure 8.6). While gerrymandering is not generally illegal in the United States, it can be challenged in court when it appears to clearly discriminate against minority populations. For example, when legislative districts where redrawn in 2015 in Gwinnett and Henry counties in Georgia, the NAACP filed a federal lawsuit because of the perception that the adjustment violated the rights of minority black

  4. When can gerrymandering be challenged in court in the U.S.?

    • Only in federal elections
    • Never, it is fully legal
    • When it discriminates against minorities
    • Whenever it occurs
    Reveal answer

    Answer: When it discriminates against minorities

    Source evidence

    PDF page 163: In the United States, boundaries play an important role in the electoral process, but in this case, district, and precinct boundaries are significant in contrast to the country boundaries that have been previously discussed. Political parties in power will sometimes rearrange the boundaries of voting districts in order to ensure victory in elections, and this practice is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering strategies can involve drawing the boundaries so that the majority of voters in a district favor the party in power. Another method is to segregate the opposition voters into several different districts (Figure 8.6). While gerrymandering is not generally illegal in the United States, it can be challenged in court when it appears to clearly discriminate against minority populations. For example, when legislative districts where redrawn in 2015 in Gwinnett and Henry counties in Georgia, the NAACP filed a federal lawsuit because of the perception that the adjustment violated the rights of minority black

  5. Who filed a federal lawsuit over the 2015 redistricting in Georgia counties?

    • The NAACP
    • The Voting Rights Commission
    • A political party
    • The Supreme Court
    Reveal answer

    Answer: The NAACP

    Source evidence

    PDF page 163: In the United States, boundaries play an important role in the electoral process, but in this case, district, and precinct boundaries are significant in contrast to the country boundaries that have been previously discussed. Political parties in power will sometimes rearrange the boundaries of voting districts in order to ensure victory in elections, and this practice is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering strategies can involve drawing the boundaries so that the majority of voters in a district favor the party in power. Another method is to segregate the opposition voters into several different districts (Figure 8.6). While gerrymandering is not generally illegal in the United States, it can be challenged in court when it appears to clearly discriminate against minority populations. For example, when legislative districts where redrawn in 2015 in Gwinnett and Henry counties in Georgia, the NAACP filed a federal lawsuit because of the perception that the adjustment violated the rights of minority black

  6. The 2015 legislative redistricting lawsuit involved which Georgia counties?

    • Gwinnett and Henry
    • Fulton and DeKalb
    • Cobb and Clayton
    • Bibb and Chatham
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Gwinnett and Henry

    Source evidence

    PDF page 163: In the United States, boundaries play an important role in the electoral process, but in this case, district, and precinct boundaries are significant in contrast to the country boundaries that have been previously discussed. Political parties in power will sometimes rearrange the boundaries of voting districts in order to ensure victory in elections, and this practice is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering strategies can involve drawing the boundaries so that the majority of voters in a district favor the party in power. Another method is to segregate the opposition voters into several different districts (Figure 8.6). While gerrymandering is not generally illegal in the United States, it can be challenged in court when it appears to clearly discriminate against minority populations. For example, when legislative districts where redrawn in 2015 in Gwinnett and Henry counties in Georgia, the NAACP filed a federal lawsuit because of the perception that the adjustment violated the rights of minority black

  7. What did the 2013 Supreme Court decision declare unconstitutional?

    • Federal oversight of redistricting
    • The Electoral College
    • State voting laws
    • All forms of gerrymandering
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Federal oversight of redistricting

    Source evidence

    PDF page 163: voters. A 2013 Supreme Court decision,

    PDF page 164: federal oversight of redistricting is not constitutional, and this decision may have an impact on such lawsuits.

  8. Which 1965 law's requirement was affected by the Supreme Court decision?

    • Fair Districting Act
    • Electoral Reform Act
    • Voting Rights Act
    • Civil Rights Act
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Voting Rights Act

    Source evidence

    PDF page 163: in the 1965 Voting Rights Act for License | CC BY SA 4.0

    PDF page 164: federal oversight of redistricting is not constitutional, and this decision may have an impact on such lawsuits.

  9. According to the source, U.S. presidential elections have what kind of component?

    • A random one
    • A non-geographic one
    • A purely economic one
    • A decidedly spatial one
    Reveal answer

    Answer: A decidedly spatial one

    Source evidence

    PDF page 164: One of the more intriguing aspects of political geography in the United States is presidential elections and how the Electoral College process has a decidedly spatial component. An examination of the presidential results from the 2016 election reveals interesting regional affiliations (Figure 8.7). Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, as well as far Western states, all tended to vote Democrat, while the rest of the electoral map is Republican. Although it appears that the Republican victory was decisive from a spatial and Electoral College perspective, from the standpoint of the popular vote, Democrats actually had more votes than Republicans. The dichotomy is explained by the very large populations in both California and New York, predominantly Democrat states. California’s large population is reflected in a high number (55) of Electoral College votes, more than any other state.

  10. In the 2016 election, which regions tended to vote Democrat?

    • Northeastern, Mid-Atlantic, far Western
    • Only rural counties
    • Midwestern states
    • Central and Southern states
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Northeastern, Mid-Atlantic, far Western

    Source evidence

    PDF page 164: One of the more intriguing aspects of political geography in the United States is presidential elections and how the Electoral College process has a decidedly spatial component. An examination of the presidential results from the 2016 election reveals interesting regional affiliations (Figure 8.7). Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, as well as far Western states, all tended to vote Democrat, while the rest of the electoral map is Republican. Although it appears that the Republican victory was decisive from a spatial and Electoral College perspective, from the standpoint of the popular vote, Democrats actually had more votes than Republicans. The dichotomy is explained by the very large populations in both California and New York, predominantly Democrat states. California’s large population is reflected in a high number (55) of Electoral College votes, more than any other state.

  11. In 2016, who had more popular votes despite the Republican Electoral College win?

    • Republicans
    • Independents
    • Democrats
    • Third parties
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Democrats

    Source evidence

    PDF page 164: One of the more intriguing aspects of political geography in the United States is presidential elections and how the Electoral College process has a decidedly spatial component. An examination of the presidential results from the 2016 election reveals interesting regional affiliations (Figure 8.7). Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, as well as far Western states, all tended to vote Democrat, while the rest of the electoral map is Republican. Although it appears that the Republican victory was decisive from a spatial and Electoral College perspective, from the standpoint of the popular vote, Democrats actually had more votes than Republicans. The dichotomy is explained by the very large populations in both California and New York, predominantly Democrat states. California’s large population is reflected in a high number (55) of Electoral College votes, more than any other state.

  12. How many Electoral College votes does California have?

    • 60
    • 55
    • 50
    • 45
    Reveal answer

    Answer: 55

    Source evidence

    PDF page 164: One of the more intriguing aspects of political geography in the United States is presidential elections and how the Electoral College process has a decidedly spatial component. An examination of the presidential results from the 2016 election reveals interesting regional affiliations (Figure 8.7). Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, as well as far Western states, all tended to vote Democrat, while the rest of the electoral map is Republican. Although it appears that the Republican victory was decisive from a spatial and Electoral College perspective, from the standpoint of the popular vote, Democrats actually had more votes than Republicans. The dichotomy is explained by the very large populations in both California and New York, predominantly Democrat states. California’s large population is reflected in a high number (55) of Electoral College votes, more than any other state.

Play the whole quiz inside a game Answers stay hidden while you play
Source

Introduction to Human Geography

Introduction to Human Geography by the University System of Georgia, used under CC BY 4.0. Changes made by Stratacademy.

Make your own — free

Turn any notes into a game in under a minute. Free to start.

Make a quiz