THE EXPANSION (AND EVENTUAL DECLINE) OF INDUSTRY Quiz
The question sheet
Reveal any answer as you study-
What does the abbreviation TNC stand for in the source?
- Trade Network Companies
- Transnational Corporations
- Transitional National Councils
- Total National Corporations
Reveal answer
Answer: Transnational Corporations
Source evidence
PDF page 236: Modern industry has become dominated by Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have the ability to coordinate and control various processes and transactions within production networks, both within and between different countries. They also have the ability to take advantage of geographical differences of factors of production and state policies. Potential geographical flexibility for sales is a final benefit. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is exactly what is sounds like. Companies invest in other countries. The usual narrative of this in the United States is simply offshoring for cheaper labor. The reality is more complicated. Just consider the examples above of the manufacturers who build facilities in the United States. They aren’t seeking cheap labor. America companies moving production may be seeking to tap into a large pool of labor, but that labor is not as cheap as it was 20 years ago. Another reason for investing in China is the same reason that other companies invest here in North America, to gain entry into a large market. Companies and individuals investing in other countries have numerous motivations. Some of these motivations are altruistic. There is no shortage of entities that seek to use FDI as a mechanism to alleviate poverty. The earlier critique of financial incentives applies
-
What is Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)?
- A type of import tariff
- Government tax on foreign goods
- Companies investing in other countries
- A regional trade agreement
Reveal answer
Answer: Companies investing in other countries
Source evidence
PDF page 236: Modern industry has become dominated by Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have the ability to coordinate and control various processes and transactions within production networks, both within and between different countries. They also have the ability to take advantage of geographical differences of factors of production and state policies. Potential geographical flexibility for sales is a final benefit. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is exactly what is sounds like. Companies invest in other countries. The usual narrative of this in the United States is simply offshoring for cheaper labor. The reality is more complicated. Just consider the examples above of the manufacturers who build facilities in the United States. They aren’t seeking cheap labor. America companies moving production may be seeking to tap into a large pool of labor, but that labor is not as cheap as it was 20 years ago. Another reason for investing in China is the same reason that other companies invest here in North America, to gain entry into a large market. Companies and individuals investing in other countries have numerous motivations. Some of these motivations are altruistic. There is no shortage of entities that seek to use FDI as a mechanism to alleviate poverty. The earlier critique of financial incentives applies
-
According to the source, why is the usual U.S. narrative about FDI oversimplified?
- FDI does not actually exist
- It ignores the role of tariffs
- Companies never invest abroad
- The reality is more complicated
Reveal answer
Answer: The reality is more complicated
Source evidence
PDF page 236: Modern industry has become dominated by Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have the ability to coordinate and control various processes and transactions within production networks, both within and between different countries. They also have the ability to take advantage of geographical differences of factors of production and state policies. Potential geographical flexibility for sales is a final benefit. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is exactly what is sounds like. Companies invest in other countries. The usual narrative of this in the United States is simply offshoring for cheaper labor. The reality is more complicated. Just consider the examples above of the manufacturers who build facilities in the United States. They aren’t seeking cheap labor. America companies moving production may be seeking to tap into a large pool of labor, but that labor is not as cheap as it was 20 years ago. Another reason for investing in China is the same reason that other companies invest here in North America, to gain entry into a large market. Companies and individuals investing in other countries have numerous motivations. Some of these motivations are altruistic. There is no shortage of entities that seek to use FDI as a mechanism to alleviate poverty. The earlier critique of financial incentives applies
-
According to the source, why might American companies move production to China besides labor?
- To escape U.S. taxes entirely
- To gain entry into a large market
- To lower shipping costs only
- To avoid all regulations
Reveal answer
Answer: To gain entry into a large market
Source evidence
PDF page 236: Modern industry has become dominated by Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have the ability to coordinate and control various processes and transactions within production networks, both within and between different countries. They also have the ability to take advantage of geographical differences of factors of production and state policies. Potential geographical flexibility for sales is a final benefit. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is exactly what is sounds like. Companies invest in other countries. The usual narrative of this in the United States is simply offshoring for cheaper labor. The reality is more complicated. Just consider the examples above of the manufacturers who build facilities in the United States. They aren’t seeking cheap labor. America companies moving production may be seeking to tap into a large pool of labor, but that labor is not as cheap as it was 20 years ago. Another reason for investing in China is the same reason that other companies invest here in North America, to gain entry into a large market. Companies and individuals investing in other countries have numerous motivations. Some of these motivations are altruistic. There is no shortage of entities that seek to use FDI as a mechanism to alleviate poverty. The earlier critique of financial incentives applies
-
How does the source describe Chinese labor compared to 20 years ago?
- Identical in cost
- Not as cheap as it was
- Cheaper than ever before
- Completely unavailable
Reveal answer
Answer: Not as cheap as it was
Source evidence
PDF page 236: Modern industry has become dominated by Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have the ability to coordinate and control various processes and transactions within production networks, both within and between different countries. They also have the ability to take advantage of geographical differences of factors of production and state policies. Potential geographical flexibility for sales is a final benefit. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is exactly what is sounds like. Companies invest in other countries. The usual narrative of this in the United States is simply offshoring for cheaper labor. The reality is more complicated. Just consider the examples above of the manufacturers who build facilities in the United States. They aren’t seeking cheap labor. America companies moving production may be seeking to tap into a large pool of labor, but that labor is not as cheap as it was 20 years ago. Another reason for investing in China is the same reason that other companies invest here in North America, to gain entry into a large market. Companies and individuals investing in other countries have numerous motivations. Some of these motivations are altruistic. There is no shortage of entities that seek to use FDI as a mechanism to alleviate poverty. The earlier critique of financial incentives applies
-
According to the source, some motivations for investing in other countries are:
- Altruistic
- Never economic
- Always illegal
- Purely political
Reveal answer
Answer: Altruistic
Source evidence
PDF page 236: Modern industry has become dominated by Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have the ability to coordinate and control various processes and transactions within production networks, both within and between different countries. They also have the ability to take advantage of geographical differences of factors of production and state policies. Potential geographical flexibility for sales is a final benefit. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is exactly what is sounds like. Companies invest in other countries. The usual narrative of this in the United States is simply offshoring for cheaper labor. The reality is more complicated. Just consider the examples above of the manufacturers who build facilities in the United States. They aren’t seeking cheap labor. America companies moving production may be seeking to tap into a large pool of labor, but that labor is not as cheap as it was 20 years ago. Another reason for investing in China is the same reason that other companies invest here in North America, to gain entry into a large market. Companies and individuals investing in other countries have numerous motivations. Some of these motivations are altruistic. There is no shortage of entities that seek to use FDI as a mechanism to alleviate poverty. The earlier critique of financial incentives applies
-
What did some entities seek to use FDI as a mechanism to do?
- Reduce global trade
- Increase military power
- Alleviate poverty
- Control elections
Reveal answer
Answer: Alleviate poverty
Source evidence
PDF page 236: Modern industry has become dominated by Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have the ability to coordinate and control various processes and transactions within production networks, both within and between different countries. They also have the ability to take advantage of geographical differences of factors of production and state policies. Potential geographical flexibility for sales is a final benefit. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is exactly what is sounds like. Companies invest in other countries. The usual narrative of this in the United States is simply offshoring for cheaper labor. The reality is more complicated. Just consider the examples above of the manufacturers who build facilities in the United States. They aren’t seeking cheap labor. America companies moving production may be seeking to tap into a large pool of labor, but that labor is not as cheap as it was 20 years ago. Another reason for investing in China is the same reason that other companies invest here in North America, to gain entry into a large market. Companies and individuals investing in other countries have numerous motivations. Some of these motivations are altruistic. There is no shortage of entities that seek to use FDI as a mechanism to alleviate poverty. The earlier critique of financial incentives applies
-
Which countries are described as functioning almost solely as sources of inputs?
- Germany, Japan, Singapore
- France, Italy, Spain
- China, Korea, USA
- Niger, DR Congo, Venezuela
Reveal answer
Answer: Niger, DR Congo, Venezuela
Source evidence
PDF page 237: directly of foreign direct investment, for obvious reasons. Poor and desperate places will sometimes make economic decisions that make little economic sense. FDI has an established history. Initially companies in wealthy countries were mostly interested in extracting raw materials from other, usually poorer, countries. This continues to this day. Countries like Niger, The Democratic Republic of Congo, and Venezuela function almost solely as a source of inputs for other companies based in other countries. Other places have seen investment in factories. Sometimes this is due to very low-cost labor, but in many instances, it is due to the fact that their wages are relatively low and they are relatively close to their market. An example of this was seen in Eastern Europe when many of these countries entered the European Union. The next graph is slightly different. It shows the different trajectories of manufacturing in general as part of a countries economy. As you can see, manufacturing as a share of GPD in the United States has been quite low for some time. Manufacturing in China and Korea is much more important, but in both these places, the relative value of manufacturing is falling. In Germany, Japan and Singapore, the value of manufacturing is rising, although at very moderate levels. Note that neither of these graphs account for wages produced from manufacturing employment.
-
Investment in factories after EU entry was seen in which region?
- South America
- Western Africa
- Eastern Europe
- Southeast Asia
Reveal answer
Answer: Eastern Europe
Source evidence
PDF page 237: directly of foreign direct investment, for obvious reasons. Poor and desperate places will sometimes make economic decisions that make little economic sense. FDI has an established history. Initially companies in wealthy countries were mostly interested in extracting raw materials from other, usually poorer, countries. This continues to this day. Countries like Niger, The Democratic Republic of Congo, and Venezuela function almost solely as a source of inputs for other companies based in other countries. Other places have seen investment in factories. Sometimes this is due to very low-cost labor, but in many instances, it is due to the fact that their wages are relatively low and they are relatively close to their market. An example of this was seen in Eastern Europe when many of these countries entered the European Union. The next graph is slightly different. It shows the different trajectories of manufacturing in general as part of a countries economy. As you can see, manufacturing as a share of GPD in the United States has been quite low for some time. Manufacturing in China and Korea is much more important, but in both these places, the relative value of manufacturing is falling. In Germany, Japan and Singapore, the value of manufacturing is rising, although at very moderate levels. Note that neither of these graphs account for wages produced from manufacturing employment.
-
According to the source, manufacturing as a share of GDP in the U.S. has been:
- The highest in the world
- Steadily increasing
- Quite low for some time
- Rising sharply
Reveal answer
Answer: Quite low for some time
Source evidence
PDF page 237: directly of foreign direct investment, for obvious reasons. Poor and desperate places will sometimes make economic decisions that make little economic sense. FDI has an established history. Initially companies in wealthy countries were mostly interested in extracting raw materials from other, usually poorer, countries. This continues to this day. Countries like Niger, The Democratic Republic of Congo, and Venezuela function almost solely as a source of inputs for other companies based in other countries. Other places have seen investment in factories. Sometimes this is due to very low-cost labor, but in many instances, it is due to the fact that their wages are relatively low and they are relatively close to their market. An example of this was seen in Eastern Europe when many of these countries entered the European Union. The next graph is slightly different. It shows the different trajectories of manufacturing in general as part of a countries economy. As you can see, manufacturing as a share of GPD in the United States has been quite low for some time. Manufacturing in China and Korea is much more important, but in both these places, the relative value of manufacturing is falling. In Germany, Japan and Singapore, the value of manufacturing is rising, although at very moderate levels. Note that neither of these graphs account for wages produced from manufacturing employment.
-
In China and Korea, the relative value of manufacturing is described as:
- Falling
- Perfectly stable
- The highest ever
- Rising rapidly
Reveal answer
Answer: Falling
Source evidence
PDF page 237: directly of foreign direct investment, for obvious reasons. Poor and desperate places will sometimes make economic decisions that make little economic sense. FDI has an established history. Initially companies in wealthy countries were mostly interested in extracting raw materials from other, usually poorer, countries. This continues to this day. Countries like Niger, The Democratic Republic of Congo, and Venezuela function almost solely as a source of inputs for other companies based in other countries. Other places have seen investment in factories. Sometimes this is due to very low-cost labor, but in many instances, it is due to the fact that their wages are relatively low and they are relatively close to their market. An example of this was seen in Eastern Europe when many of these countries entered the European Union. The next graph is slightly different. It shows the different trajectories of manufacturing in general as part of a countries economy. As you can see, manufacturing as a share of GPD in the United States has been quite low for some time. Manufacturing in China and Korea is much more important, but in both these places, the relative value of manufacturing is falling. In Germany, Japan and Singapore, the value of manufacturing is rising, although at very moderate levels. Note that neither of these graphs account for wages produced from manufacturing employment.
-
In which countries is the value of manufacturing rising at moderate levels?
- Niger, Congo, Venezuela
- China, Korea, USA
- Brazil, India, Mexico
- Germany, Japan, Singapore
Reveal answer
Answer: Germany, Japan, Singapore
Source evidence
PDF page 237: directly of foreign direct investment, for obvious reasons. Poor and desperate places will sometimes make economic decisions that make little economic sense. FDI has an established history. Initially companies in wealthy countries were mostly interested in extracting raw materials from other, usually poorer, countries. This continues to this day. Countries like Niger, The Democratic Republic of Congo, and Venezuela function almost solely as a source of inputs for other companies based in other countries. Other places have seen investment in factories. Sometimes this is due to very low-cost labor, but in many instances, it is due to the fact that their wages are relatively low and they are relatively close to their market. An example of this was seen in Eastern Europe when many of these countries entered the European Union. The next graph is slightly different. It shows the different trajectories of manufacturing in general as part of a countries economy. As you can see, manufacturing as a share of GPD in the United States has been quite low for some time. Manufacturing in China and Korea is much more important, but in both these places, the relative value of manufacturing is falling. In Germany, Japan and Singapore, the value of manufacturing is rising, although at very moderate levels. Note that neither of these graphs account for wages produced from manufacturing employment.
Introduction to Human Geography
Introduction to Human Geography by the University System of Georgia, used under CC BY 4.0. Changes made by Stratacademy.
Make your own — free
Turn any notes into a game in under a minute. Free to start.