Quasars Quiz
The question sheet
Reveal any answer as you study-
What was the original meaning of the term 'quasars'?
- Quiet stellar radio signals
- Quasi-solar radiation systems
- Quick stellar remnants
- Quasi-stellar radio sources
Reveal answer
Answer: Quasi-stellar radio sources
Source evidence
PDF page 972: The name “ quasars” started out as short for “quasi-stellar radio sources” (here “quasi-stellar” means “sort of like stars”). The discovery of radio sources that appeared point-like, just like stars, came with the use of surplus World War II radar equipment in the 1950s. Although few astronomers would have predicted it, the sky turned out to be full of strong sources of radio waves. As they improved the images that their new radio telescopes could make, scientists discovered that some radio sources were in the same location as faint blue “stars.” No known type of star in our Galaxy emits such powerful radio radiation. What then were these “quasi-stellar radio sources”?
-
What surplus equipment led to the discovery of point-like radio sources in the 1950s?
- Sonar buoys
- World War II radar equipment
- Aircraft engines
- Naval telescopes
Reveal answer
Answer: World War II radar equipment
Source evidence
PDF page 972: The name “ quasars” started out as short for “quasi-stellar radio sources” (here “quasi-stellar” means “sort of like stars”). The discovery of radio sources that appeared point-like, just like stars, came with the use of surplus World War II radar equipment in the 1950s. Although few astronomers would have predicted it, the sky turned out to be full of strong sources of radio waves. As they improved the images that their new radio telescopes could make, scientists discovered that some radio sources were in the same location as faint blue “stars.” No known type of star in our Galaxy emits such powerful radio radiation. What then were these “quasi-stellar radio sources”?
-
Why were the first quasar spectra so mysterious?
- Their lines matched no known substance
- They showed no emission lines
- They showed only blueshifts
- They were completely dark
Reveal answer
Answer: Their lines matched no known substance
Source evidence
PDF page 972: The answer came when astronomers obtained visible-light spectra of two of those faint “blue stars” that were strong sources of radio waves (Figure 27.2). Spectra of these radio “stars” only deepened the mystery: they had emission lines, but astronomers at first could not identify them with any known substance. By the 1960s, astronomers had a century of experience in identifying elements and compounds in the spectra of stars. Elaborate tables had been published showing the lines that each element would produce under a wide range of conditions. A “star” with unidentifiable lines in the ordinary visible light spectrum had to be something completely new.
-
Who solved the puzzle of quasar spectra in 1963?
- Allan Sandage
- Carl Seyfert
- Heber Curtis
- Maarten Schmidt
Reveal answer
Answer: Maarten Schmidt
Source evidence
PDF page 972: In 1963 at Caltech’s Palomar Observatory, Maarten Schmidt (Figure 27.3) was puzzling over the spectrum of one of the radio stars, which was named 3C 273 because it was the 273rd entry in the third Cambridge catalog of radio sources (part (b) of Figure 27.3). There were strong emission lines in the spectrum, and Schmidt recognized that they had the same spacing between them as the Balmer lines of hydrogen (see Radiation and Spectra). But the lines in 3C 273 were shifted far to the red of the wavelengths at which the Balmer lines are normally located. Indeed, these lines were at such long wavelengths that if the redshifts were attributed to the Doppler effect, 3C 273 was receding from us at a speed of 45,000 kilometers per second, or about 15% the speed of light! Since stars don’t show Doppler shifts this large, no one had thought of considering high redshifts to be the cause of the strange spectra.
PDF page 973: Figure 27.3 Quasar Pioneers and Quasar 3C 273. (a) Maarten Schmidt (left), who solved the puzzle of the quasar spectra in 1963, shares a joke
-
What lines did Schmidt recognize in the spectrum of 3C 273?
- Sodium lines
- Calcium lines
- Helium lines
- Balmer lines of hydrogen
Reveal answer
Answer: Balmer lines of hydrogen
Source evidence
PDF page 972: In 1963 at Caltech’s Palomar Observatory, Maarten Schmidt (Figure 27.3) was puzzling over the spectrum of one of the radio stars, which was named 3C 273 because it was the 273rd entry in the third Cambridge catalog of radio sources (part (b) of Figure 27.3). There were strong emission lines in the spectrum, and Schmidt recognized that they had the same spacing between them as the Balmer lines of hydrogen (see Radiation and Spectra). But the lines in 3C 273 were shifted far to the red of the wavelengths at which the Balmer lines are normally located. Indeed, these lines were at such long wavelengths that if the redshifts were attributed to the Doppler effect, 3C 273 was receding from us at a speed of 45,000 kilometers per second, or about 15% the speed of light! Since stars don’t show Doppler shifts this large, no one had thought of considering high redshifts to be the cause of the strange spectra.
-
At what speed did the redshift imply 3C 273 was receding?
- 300 km/s
- 2,000 km/s
- 67,000 miles/s
- 45,000 km/s
Reveal answer
Answer: 45,000 km/s
Source evidence
PDF page 972: In 1963 at Caltech’s Palomar Observatory, Maarten Schmidt (Figure 27.3) was puzzling over the spectrum of one of the radio stars, which was named 3C 273 because it was the 273rd entry in the third Cambridge catalog of radio sources (part (b) of Figure 27.3). There were strong emission lines in the spectrum, and Schmidt recognized that they had the same spacing between them as the Balmer lines of hydrogen (see Radiation and Spectra). But the lines in 3C 273 were shifted far to the red of the wavelengths at which the Balmer lines are normally located. Indeed, these lines were at such long wavelengths that if the redshifts were attributed to the Doppler effect, 3C 273 was receding from us at a speed of 45,000 kilometers per second, or about 15% the speed of light! Since stars don’t show Doppler shifts this large, no one had thought of considering high redshifts to be the cause of the strange spectra.
-
Why did the huge speeds show radio 'stars' could not be stars in our Galaxy?
- They would escape the Galaxy's gravity
- Stars never move at all
- They were too dim to be stars
- Stars cannot emit any light
Reveal answer
Answer: They would escape the Galaxy's gravity
Source evidence
PDF page 973: The puzzling emission lines in other star-like radio sources were then reexamined to see if they, too, might be well-known lines with large redshifts. This proved to be the case, but the other objects were found to be receding from us at even greater speeds. Their astounding speeds showed that the radio “stars” could not possibly be stars in our own Galaxy. Any true star moving at more than a few hundred kilometers per second would be able to overcome the gravitational pull of the Galaxy and completely escape from it. (As we shall see later in this chapter, astronomers eventually discovered that there was also more to these “stars” than just a point of light.) It turns out that these high-velocity objects only look like stars because they are compact and very far away. Later, astronomers discovered objects with large redshifts that appear star-like but have no radio emission. Observations also showed that quasars were bright in the infrared and X-ray bands too, and not all these X-ray or infrared-bright quasars could be seen in either the radio or the visible-light bands of the spectrum. Today, all these objects are referred to as quasi-stellar objects (QSOs), or, as they are more popularly known, quasars. (The name was also soon appropriated by a manufacturer of home electronics.)
-
According to the text, all quasar spectra show what?
- No shifts at all
- Both shifts equally
- Blueshifts only
- Redshifts, none blueshifts
Reveal answer
Answer: Redshifts, none blueshifts
Source evidence
PDF page 973: Over a million quasars have now been discovered, and spectra are available for over a hundred thousand. All these spectra show redshifts, none show blueshifts, and their redshifts can be very large. Yet in a photo they look just like stars (Figure 27.4).
-
What is the redshift symbol z formula in the classical Doppler case?
- z = c/v
- z = λ/c
- z = v×c
- z = Δλ/λ
Reveal answer
Answer: z = Δλ/λ
Source evidence
PDF page 974: The formula for the Doppler shift, which astronomers denote by the letters z, is Δλ v
PDF page 974: λ c where λ is the wavelength emitted by a source of radiation that is not moving, Δλ is the difference between that wavelength and the wavelength we measure, v is the speed with which the source moves away, and c (as usual) is the speed of light.
-
For a quasar with redshift 5, what fraction of light speed is it receding at?
- About 20%
- About 67%
- About 95%
- About 45%
Reveal answer
Answer: About 95%
Source evidence
PDF page 975: Let’s do an example. Suppose a distant quasar has a redshift of 5. At what fraction of the speed of light is the quasar moving away?
PDF page 975: The quasar is thus receding from us at about 95% the speed of light.
-
What provided the strongest evidence that quasars sit at galaxy centers?
- Sound-wave detection
- Hubble Space Telescope observations
- Naked-eye viewing
- Radar measurements
Reveal answer
Answer: Hubble Space Telescope observations
Source evidence
PDF page 976: quasars had to obey the Hubble law was to demonstrate that they were actually part of galaxies, and that their redshift was the same as the galaxy that hosted them. Since ordinary galaxies do obey the Hubble law, anything within them would be subject to the same rules. Observations with the Hubble Space Telescope provided the strongest evidence showing that quasars are located at the centers of galaxies. Hints that this is true had been obtained with ground-based telescopes, but space observations were required to make a convincing case. The reason is that quasars can outshine their entire galaxies by factors of 10 to 100 or even more. When this light passes through Earth’s atmosphere, it is blurred by turbulence and drowns out the faint light from the surrounding galaxy—much as the bright headlights from an oncoming car at night make it difficult to see anything close by. The Hubble Space Telescope, however, is not affected by atmospheric turbulence and can detect the faint glow from some of the galaxies that host quasars (Figure 27.5). Quasars have been found in the cores of both spiral and elliptical galaxies, and each quasar has the same redshift as its host galaxy. A wide range of studies with the Hubble Space Telescope now clearly demonstrate that quasars are indeed far away. If so, they must be producing a truly impressive amount of energy to be detectable as points of light that are much brighter than their galaxy. Interestingly, many quasar host galaxies are found to be involved in a collision with a second galaxy, providing, as we shall see, an important clue to the source of their prodigious energy output.
-
Why do quasars often drown out their host galaxies in ground images?
- They block all starlight
- Galaxies are behind them
- They outshine galaxies 10 to 100 times
- Galaxies emit no light
Reveal answer
Answer: They outshine galaxies 10 to 100 times
Source evidence
PDF page 976: quasars had to obey the Hubble law was to demonstrate that they were actually part of galaxies, and that their redshift was the same as the galaxy that hosted them. Since ordinary galaxies do obey the Hubble law, anything within them would be subject to the same rules. Observations with the Hubble Space Telescope provided the strongest evidence showing that quasars are located at the centers of galaxies. Hints that this is true had been obtained with ground-based telescopes, but space observations were required to make a convincing case. The reason is that quasars can outshine their entire galaxies by factors of 10 to 100 or even more. When this light passes through Earth’s atmosphere, it is blurred by turbulence and drowns out the faint light from the surrounding galaxy—much as the bright headlights from an oncoming car at night make it difficult to see anything close by. The Hubble Space Telescope, however, is not affected by atmospheric turbulence and can detect the faint glow from some of the galaxies that host quasars (Figure 27.5). Quasars have been found in the cores of both spiral and elliptical galaxies, and each quasar has the same redshift as its host galaxy. A wide range of studies with the Hubble Space Telescope now clearly demonstrate that quasars are indeed far away. If so, they must be producing a truly impressive amount of energy to be detectable as points of light that are much brighter than their galaxy. Interestingly, many quasar host galaxies are found to be involved in a collision with a second galaxy, providing, as we shall see, an important clue to the source of their prodigious energy output.
Astronomy
Astronomy by OpenStax, used under CC BY 4.0. Changes made by Stratacademy.
Make your own — free
Turn any notes into a game in under a minute. Free to start.