A Stellar Census Quiz
The question sheet
Reveal any answer as you study-
Why did astronomers need to measure the characteristics of many stars to understand stellar life stories?
- Stars are too bright to observe
- Stars move too quickly
- Stars are all identical
- Stars live too long to watch one evolve
Reveal answer
Answer: Stars live too long to watch one evolve
Source evidence
PDF page 633: How do stars form? How long do they live? And how do they die? Stop and think how hard it is to answer these questions. Stars live such a long time that nothing much can be gained from staring at one for a human lifetime. To discover how stars evolve from birth to death, it was necessary to measure the characteristics of many stars (to take a celestial census, in effect) and then determine which characteristics help us understand the stars’ life stories. Astronomers tried a variety of hypotheses about stars until they came up with the right approach to understanding their development. But the key was first making a thorough census of the stars around us.
-
What is a light-year a unit of?
- Brightness
- Time
- Speed
- Distance
Reveal answer
Answer: Distance
Source evidence
PDF page 634: Before we can make our own survey, we need to agree on a unit of distance appropriate to the objects we are studying. The stars are all so far away that kilometers (and even astronomical units) would be very cumbersome to use; so—as discussed in Science and the Universe: A Brief Tour—astronomers use a much larger “measuring stick” called the light-year. A light-year is the distance that light (the fastest signal we know) travels in 1 year. Since light covers an astounding 300,000 kilometers per second, and since there are a lot of
PDF page 634: seconds in 1 year, a light-year is a very large quantity: 9.5 trillion (9.5 × 10 ) kilometers to be exact. (Bear in mind that the light-year is a unit of distance even though the term year appears in it.) If you drove at the legal US speed limit without stopping for food or rest, you would not arrive at the end of a light-year in space until roughly 12 million years had passed. And the closest star is more than 4 light-years away. Notice that we have not yet said much about how such enormous distances can be measured. That is a complicated question, to which we will return in Celestial Distances. For now, let us assume that distances have been measured for stars in our cosmic vicinity so that we can proceed with our census.
-
How many kilometers are in one light-year, according to the text?
- 9.5 trillion km
- 300,000 km
- 100,000 km
- 4 trillion km
Reveal answer
Answer: 9.5 trillion km
Source evidence
PDF page 634: seconds in 1 year, a light-year is a very large quantity: 9.5 trillion (9.5 × 10 ) kilometers to be exact. (Bear in mind that the light-year is a unit of distance even though the term year appears in it.) If you drove at the legal US speed limit without stopping for food or rest, you would not arrive at the end of a light-year in space until roughly 12 million years had passed. And the closest star is more than 4 light-years away. Notice that we have not yet said much about how such enormous distances can be measured. That is a complicated question, to which we will return in Celestial Distances. For now, let us assume that distances have been measured for stars in our cosmic vicinity so that we can proceed with our census.
-
How far does light travel each second?
- 300,000 km
- 30 km
- 5000 km
- 9.5 trillion km
Reveal answer
Answer: 300,000 km
Source evidence
PDF page 634: Before we can make our own survey, we need to agree on a unit of distance appropriate to the objects we are studying. The stars are all so far away that kilometers (and even astronomical units) would be very cumbersome to use; so—as discussed in Science and the Universe: A Brief Tour—astronomers use a much larger “measuring stick” called the light-year. A light-year is the distance that light (the fastest signal we know) travels in 1 year. Since light covers an astounding 300,000 kilometers per second, and since there are a lot of
-
About how far away is the closest star to the Sun?
- More than 4 light-years
- 100 light-years
- Less than 1 light-year
- 21 light-years
Reveal answer
Answer: More than 4 light-years
Source evidence
PDF page 634: seconds in 1 year, a light-year is a very large quantity: 9.5 trillion (9.5 × 10 ) kilometers to be exact. (Bear in mind that the light-year is a unit of distance even though the term year appears in it.) If you drove at the legal US speed limit without stopping for food or rest, you would not arrive at the end of a light-year in space until roughly 12 million years had passed. And the closest star is more than 4 light-years away. Notice that we have not yet said much about how such enormous distances can be measured. That is a complicated question, to which we will return in Celestial Distances. For now, let us assume that distances have been measured for stars in our cosmic vicinity so that we can proceed with our census.
-
Table 18.1 counts stars within what distance of the Sun?
- 5 light-years
- 5000 light-years
- 21 light-years
- 100 light-years
Reveal answer
Answer: 21 light-years
Source evidence
PDF page 634: neighborhood—within 21 light-years of the Sun. (The Milky Way Galaxy, in which we live, is about 100,000 lightyears in diameter, so this figure really applies to a very local neighborhood, one that contains a tiny fraction of all the billions of stars in the Milky Way.) You can see that there are many more low-luminosity (and hence low mass) stars than high-luminosity ones. Only three of the stars in our local neighborhood (one F type and two A types) are significantly more luminous and more massive than the Sun. This is truly a case where small triumphs over large—at least in terms of numbers. The Sun is more massive than the vast majority of stars in our vicinity.
-
What is the approximate diameter of the Milky Way Galaxy?
- 9.5 trillion light-years
- 5000 light-years
- 21 light-years
- 100,000 light-years
Reveal answer
Answer: 100,000 light-years
Source evidence
PDF page 634: neighborhood—within 21 light-years of the Sun. (The Milky Way Galaxy, in which we live, is about 100,000 lightyears in diameter, so this figure really applies to a very local neighborhood, one that contains a tiny fraction of all the billions of stars in the Milky Way.) You can see that there are many more low-luminosity (and hence low mass) stars than high-luminosity ones. Only three of the stars in our local neighborhood (one F type and two A types) are significantly more luminous and more massive than the Sun. This is truly a case where small triumphs over large—at least in terms of numbers. The Sun is more massive than the vast majority of stars in our vicinity.
-
In the local neighborhood, which type of star is most common?
- B-type stars
- Low-luminosity, low-mass stars
- Stars like the Sun
- High-luminosity, high-mass stars
Reveal answer
Answer: Low-luminosity, low-mass stars
Source evidence
PDF page 634: neighborhood—within 21 light-years of the Sun. (The Milky Way Galaxy, in which we live, is about 100,000 lightyears in diameter, so this figure really applies to a very local neighborhood, one that contains a tiny fraction of all the billions of stars in the Milky Way.) You can see that there are many more low-luminosity (and hence low mass) stars than high-luminosity ones. Only three of the stars in our local neighborhood (one F type and two A types) are significantly more luminous and more massive than the Sun. This is truly a case where small triumphs over large—at least in terms of numbers. The Sun is more massive than the vast majority of stars in our vicinity.
-
How does the Sun's mass compare to most stars in its vicinity?
- Less massive than most
- More massive than most
- Exactly average
- Equal to all others
Reveal answer
Answer: More massive than most
Source evidence
PDF page 634: neighborhood—within 21 light-years of the Sun. (The Milky Way Galaxy, in which we live, is about 100,000 lightyears in diameter, so this figure really applies to a very local neighborhood, one that contains a tiny fraction of all the billions of stars in the Milky Way.) You can see that there are many more low-luminosity (and hence low mass) stars than high-luminosity ones. Only three of the stars in our local neighborhood (one F type and two A types) are significantly more luminous and more massive than the Sun. This is truly a case where small triumphs over large—at least in terms of numbers. The Sun is more massive than the vast majority of stars in our vicinity.
-
Why are the lowest-mass dwarfs so hard to find?
- They are hidden by the Sun
- They emit very little light
- They move too fast
- They are too far away
Reveal answer
Answer: They emit very little light
Source evidence
PDF page 635: This table is based on data published through 2015, and it is likely that more faint objects remain to be discovered (see Figure 18.2). Along with the L and T brown dwarfs already observed in our neighborhood, astronomers expect to find perhaps hundreds of additional T dwarfs. Many of these are likely to be even cooler than the coolest currently known T dwarf. The reason the lowest-mass dwarfs are so hard to find is that they put out very little light—ten thousand to a million times less light than the Sun. Only recently has our technology progressed to the point that we can detect these dim, cool objects.
-
Which telescope helped recently find nearby brown dwarfs?
- The Hubble telescope
- A radio telescope
- A refracting telescope
- The WISE infrared telescope
Reveal answer
Answer: The WISE infrared telescope
Source evidence
PDF page 635: light-years away. The Sun is in the center. All the brown dwarfs are circled; those found earlier are circled in blue, the ones found recently with the WISE infrared telescope in space (whose scientists put this diagram together) are circled in red. The common M stars, which are red and faint, are made to look brighter than they really would be so that you can see them in the simulation. Note that luminous hot stars like our Sun are very rare. (credit: modification of work by NASA/ JPL-Caltech)
-
Why can't the closest stars in Table 18.1 be seen with the naked eye?
- They are behind the Sun
- They are B-type stars
- They are fainter than the Sun
- They are too bright
Reveal answer
Answer: They are fainter than the Sun
Source evidence
PDF page 635: To put all this in perspective, we note that even though the stars counted in the table are our closest neighbors, you can’t just look up at the night sky and see them without a telescope; stars fainter than the Sun cannot be seen with the unaided eye unless they are very nearby. For example, stars with luminosities ranging from 1/100 to 1/10,000 the luminosity of the Sun (LSun) are very common, but a star with a luminosity of 1/100 LSun would have to be within 5 light-years to be visible to the naked eye—and only three stars (all in one system) are this close to us. The nearest of these three stars, Proxima Centauri, still cannot be seen without a telescope because it has such a low luminosity. Astronomers are working hard these days to complete the census of our local neighborhood by finding our faintest neighbors. Recent discoveries of nearby stars have relied heavily upon infrared telescopes that are able to find these many cool, low-mass stars. You should expect the number of known stars within 26 light-years of the Sun to keep increasing as more and better surveys are undertaken.
Astronomy
Astronomy by OpenStax, used under CC BY 4.0. Changes made by Stratacademy.
Make your own — free
Turn any notes into a game in under a minute. Free to start.