← Physics quizzes

From OpenStax

Discovery of the Parts of the Atom: Electrons and Nuclei Quiz

12 questions physics Grades 9-12

The question sheet

Reveal any answer as you study
  1. Who improved gas discharge tube experiments and measured the charge-to-mass ratio of the electron?

    • Robert Millikan
    • J. J. Thomson
    • Heinrich Geissler
    • Ernest Rutherford
    Reveal answer

    Answer: J. J. Thomson

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1425: the anode; they excite atoms and molecules in the gas, which glow in response. Once called Geissler tubes and later Crookes tubes, they are now known as cathode-ray tubes (CRTs) and are found in older TVs, computer screens, and x-ray machines. When a magnetic field is applied, the beam bends in the direction expected for negative charge. (credit: Paul Downey, Flickr) The English physicist J. J. Thomson (1856–1940) improved and expanded the scope of experiments with gas discharge tubes. (See Figure 30.5 and Figure 30.6.) He verified the negative charge of the cathode rays with both magnetic and electric fields. Additionally, he collected the rays in a metal cup and found an excess of negative charge. Thomson was also able to measure the ratio of the charge of the electron to its mass, —an important

  2. In a gas discharge tube, electrons are accelerated from which electrode to which?

    • Anode to cathode
    • Anode to anode
    • Cathode to anode
    • Cathode to cathode
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Cathode to anode

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1425: Gas discharge tubes, such as that shown in Figure 30.4, consist of an evacuated glass tube containing two metal electrodes and a rarefied gas. When a high voltage is applied to the electrodes, the gas glows. These tubes were the precursors to today’s neon lights. They were first studied seriously by Heinrich Geissler, a German inventor and glassblower, starting in the 1860s. The English scientist William Crookes, among others, continued to study what for some time were called Crookes tubes, wherein electrons are freed from atoms and molecules in the rarefied gas inside the tube and are accelerated from the cathode (negative) to the anode (positive) by the high potential. These “cathode rays” collide with the gas atoms and molecules and excite them, resulting in the emission of electromagnetic (EM) radiation that makes the electrons’ path visible as a ray that spreads and fades as it moves away from the cathode. Gas discharge tubes today are most commonly called cathode-ray tubes, because the rays originate at the cathode. Crookes showed that the electrons carry momentum (they can make a small paddle wheel rotate). He also found that their normally straight path is bent by a magnet in the direction expected for a negative charge moving away from the cathode. These were the first direct indications of electrons and their charge.

  3. Crookes showed that the path of cathode rays could be bent by what?

    • A magnet
    • Sound waves
    • Heat
    • Gravity
    Reveal answer

    Answer: A magnet

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1425: Gas discharge tubes, such as that shown in Figure 30.4, consist of an evacuated glass tube containing two metal electrodes and a rarefied gas. When a high voltage is applied to the electrodes, the gas glows. These tubes were the precursors to today’s neon lights. They were first studied seriously by Heinrich Geissler, a German inventor and glassblower, starting in the 1860s. The English scientist William Crookes, among others, continued to study what for some time were called Crookes tubes, wherein electrons are freed from atoms and molecules in the rarefied gas inside the tube and are accelerated from the cathode (negative) to the anode (positive) by the high potential. These “cathode rays” collide with the gas atoms and molecules and excite them, resulting in the emission of electromagnetic (EM) radiation that makes the electrons’ path visible as a ray that spreads and fades as it moves away from the cathode. Gas discharge tubes today are most commonly called cathode-ray tubes, because the rays originate at the cathode. Crookes showed that the electrons carry momentum (they can make a small paddle wheel rotate). He also found that their normally straight path is bent by a magnet in the direction expected for a negative charge moving away from the cathode. These were the first direct indications of electrons and their charge.

  4. What did Crookes demonstrate about electrons using a small paddle wheel?

    • They emit light
    • They are positive
    • They have no mass
    • They carry momentum
    Reveal answer

    Answer: They carry momentum

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1425: Gas discharge tubes, such as that shown in Figure 30.4, consist of an evacuated glass tube containing two metal electrodes and a rarefied gas. When a high voltage is applied to the electrodes, the gas glows. These tubes were the precursors to today’s neon lights. They were first studied seriously by Heinrich Geissler, a German inventor and glassblower, starting in the 1860s. The English scientist William Crookes, among others, continued to study what for some time were called Crookes tubes, wherein electrons are freed from atoms and molecules in the rarefied gas inside the tube and are accelerated from the cathode (negative) to the anode (positive) by the high potential. These “cathode rays” collide with the gas atoms and molecules and excite them, resulting in the emission of electromagnetic (EM) radiation that makes the electrons’ path visible as a ray that spreads and fades as it moves away from the cathode. Gas discharge tubes today are most commonly called cathode-ray tubes, because the rays originate at the cathode. Crookes showed that the electrons carry momentum (they can make a small paddle wheel rotate). He also found that their normally straight path is bent by a magnet in the direction expected for a negative charge moving away from the cathode. These were the first direct indications of electrons and their charge.

  5. In Thomson's crossed-field apparatus, the electric field was oriented how relative to the magnetic field?

    • Parallel
    • Perpendicular
    • Anti-parallel
    • At 45 degrees
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Perpendicular

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1425: beam of electrons that passes through charging plates connected to a high-voltage power supply. An electric field is produced between the charging plates, and the cathode-ray tube is placed between the poles of a magnet so that

    PDF page 1425: the electric field is perpendicular to the magnetic field of the magnet. These fields, being perpendicular to each

  6. When the net force from the crossed fields vanishes, what quantity of the charged particle is determined?

    • Its mass
    • Its spin
    • Its velocity
    • Its charge
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Its velocity

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1425: other, produce opposing forces on the electrons. As discussed for mass spectrometers in More Applications of Magnetism, if the net force due to the fields vanishes, then the velocity of the charged particle is . In this manner, Thomson determined the velocity of the electrons and then moved the beam up and down by adjusting the electric field.

  7. Thomson's experiments with positive hydrogen ions implied the proton is how much more massive than the electron?

    • About 100 times
    • About 10 times
    • About 1000 times
    • About equal
    Reveal answer

    Answer: About 1000 times

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1427: This is a huge number, as Thomson realized, and it implies that the electron has a very small mass. It was known from electroplating that about is needed to plate a material, a factor of about 1000 less than the charge per kilogram of electrons. Thomson went on to do the same experiment for positively charged hydrogen ions (now known to be bare protons) and found a charge per kilogram about 1000 times smaller than that for the electron, implying that the proton is about 1000 times more massive than the electron. Today, we know more precisely that

  8. In the Millikan oil drop experiment, the weight of the drop is balanced by what?

    • Surface tension
    • Air pressure
    • The electric force
    • The magnetic force
    Reveal answer

    Answer: The electric force

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1428: fundamental constants in nature. Fine drops of oil become charged when sprayed. Their movement is observed between metal plates with a potential applied to oppose the gravitational force. The balance of gravitational and electric forces allows the calculation of the charge on a drop. The charge is found to be quantized in units of , thus determining directly the charge of the excess and missing electrons on the oil drops. In the Millikan oil drop experiment, fine drops of oil are sprayed from an atomizer. Some of these are charged by the process and can then be suspended between metal plates by a voltage between the plates. In this situation, the weight of the drop is balanced by the electric force: 30.7 The electric field is produced by the applied voltage, hence, , and is adjusted to just balance the drop’s weight. The drops can be seen as points of reflected light using a microscope, but they are too small to directly measure their size and mass. The mass of the drop is determined by observing how fast it falls when the voltage is turned off. Since air resistance is very significant for these submicroscopic drops, the more massive drops fall faster than the less massive, and sophisticated sedimentation calculations can reveal their mass. Oil is used rather than water, because it does not readily evaporate, and so mass is nearly constant. Once the mass of the drop is known, the charge of the electron is given by rearranging the previous equation:

  9. Why is oil used rather than water in the Millikan experiment?

    • Oil does not readily evaporate
    • Oil reflects more light
    • Oil is charged more easily
    • Oil is heavier
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Oil does not readily evaporate

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1428: fundamental constants in nature. Fine drops of oil become charged when sprayed. Their movement is observed between metal plates with a potential applied to oppose the gravitational force. The balance of gravitational and electric forces allows the calculation of the charge on a drop. The charge is found to be quantized in units of , thus determining directly the charge of the excess and missing electrons on the oil drops. In the Millikan oil drop experiment, fine drops of oil are sprayed from an atomizer. Some of these are charged by the process and can then be suspended between metal plates by a voltage between the plates. In this situation, the weight of the drop is balanced by the electric force: 30.7 The electric field is produced by the applied voltage, hence, , and is adjusted to just balance the drop’s weight. The drops can be seen as points of reflected light using a microscope, but they are too small to directly measure their size and mass. The mass of the drop is determined by observing how fast it falls when the voltage is turned off. Since air resistance is very significant for these submicroscopic drops, the more massive drops fall faster than the less massive, and sophisticated sedimentation calculations can reveal their mass. Oil is used rather than water, because it does not readily evaporate, and so mass is nearly constant. Once the mass of the drop is known, the charge of the electron is given by rearranging the previous equation:

  10. How is the mass of an oil drop determined in Millikan's experiment?

    • By observing how fast it falls
    • By weighing it directly
    • By its color
    • By measuring its charge
    Reveal answer

    Answer: By observing how fast it falls

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1428: fundamental constants in nature. Fine drops of oil become charged when sprayed. Their movement is observed between metal plates with a potential applied to oppose the gravitational force. The balance of gravitational and electric forces allows the calculation of the charge on a drop. The charge is found to be quantized in units of , thus determining directly the charge of the excess and missing electrons on the oil drops. In the Millikan oil drop experiment, fine drops of oil are sprayed from an atomizer. Some of these are charged by the process and can then be suspended between metal plates by a voltage between the plates. In this situation, the weight of the drop is balanced by the electric force: 30.7 The electric field is produced by the applied voltage, hence, , and is adjusted to just balance the drop’s weight. The drops can be seen as points of reflected light using a microscope, but they are too small to directly measure their size and mass. The mass of the drop is determined by observing how fast it falls when the voltage is turned off. Since air resistance is very significant for these submicroscopic drops, the more massive drops fall faster than the less massive, and sophisticated sedimentation calculations can reveal their mass. Oil is used rather than water, because it does not readily evaporate, and so mass is nearly constant. Once the mass of the drop is known, the charge of the electron is given by rearranging the previous equation:

  11. Millikan observed that all charges on the drops were what?

    • Always positive
    • Multiples of the electron charge
    • Random values
    • Equal to the proton mass
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Multiples of the electron charge

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1428: where is the separation of the plates and is the voltage that holds the drop motionless. (The same drop can be observed for several hours to see that it really is motionless.) By 1913 Millikan had measured the charge of the electron to an accuracy of 1%, and he improved this by a factor of 10 within a few years to a value of . He also observed that all charges were multiples of the basic electron charge and that sudden

  12. What did Rutherford use to directly examine the size and mass of the nucleus?

    • Electrons
    • X-rays
    • Cathode rays
    • Alpha radiation
    Reveal answer

    Answer: Alpha radiation

    Source evidence

    PDF page 1429: Here, we examine the first direct evidence of the size and mass of the nucleus. In later chapters, we will examine many other aspects of nuclear physics, but the basic information on nuclear size and mass is so important to understanding the atom that we consider it here. Nuclear radioactivity was discovered in 1896, and it was soon the subject of intense study by a number of the best scientists in the world. Among them was New Zealander Lord Ernest Rutherford, who made numerous fundamental discoveries and earned the title of “father of nuclear physics.” Born in Nelson, Rutherford did his postgraduate studies at the Cavendish Laboratories in England before taking up a position at McGill University in Canada where he did the work that earned him a Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1908. In the area of atomic and nuclear physics, there is much overlap between chemistry and physics, with physics providing the fundamental enabling theories. He returned to England in later years and had six future Nobel Prize winners as students. Rutherford used nuclear radiation to directly examine the size and mass of the atomic nucleus. The experiment he devised is shown in Figure 30.10. A radioactive source that emits alpha radiation was placed in a lead container with a hole in one side to produce a beam of alpha particles, which are a type of ionizing radiation ejected by the nuclei of a radioactive source. A thin gold foil was placed in the beam, and the scattering of the alpha particles was observed by the glow they caused when they struck a phosphor screen.

Play the whole quiz inside a game Answers stay hidden while you play

Make your own — free

Turn any notes into a game in under a minute. Free to start.

Make a quiz